Through the years, the holiday has been variously known as
Washington’s Birthday, Washington’s and
Lincoln’s Birthday, Presidents Day, Presidents’ Day and President’s Day.
Back in the 1950’s there was an effort to make the holiday a
celebration of the office of the presidency rather than a commemoration of any
particular President. That idea got a push from commercial advertisers.
Today, the holiday is basically a day off of work for
government employees and a day on which many businesses offer merchandise as
bargain prices.
It’s safe to say that, these days, there is not a whole lot
of enthusiasm in America for celebrating the office of the presidency. A few
days ago, Intelligence Squared, an organization which sponsors public debates,
hosted a debate entitled “Give Trump a Chance.”
The debaters were all serious, intelligent professionals.
The audience was polled before the debate began. Only 27 percent agreed that he
should be given a chance, while 48 percent disagreed. After the debate, they
were polled again. This time, only 22 percent of the audience thought Trump
should be given a chance, and a whopping 72 percent disagreed.
I suppose we can discount the numbers somewhat, since
Intelligence Squared typically draws its audiences from among the academic and
professional communities, which tend to be Democrat and Liberal.
Still, it is troubling to note that there is a large segment
of the American people who not only do not like or support the current occupant
of the White House; they adamantly oppose him and want him to fail.
It is hard to imagine how the United States of America might
benefit by having a failed President in the White House. Why would any honest
citizen cheer an increase in crime or unemployment? Why would anyone who loves
this nation want to see its fortunes decline, its factories close, its jobs
migrate to other countries?
The fact is that the success or failure of a President is
tied to the prosperity and felicity of the nation. In my church, we pray for
all of our elected officials, whether we voted for them not. Good citizens want
their leaders to lead and to succeed.
The President of the United States is a constitutional
officer. His powers and duties are specified in the charter of our nation.
There is nothing in the law of the land which requires or anticipates that the
President must be or will be a popular leader.
George Washington was popular, indeed, he was elected and
reelected by unanimous votes in the Electoral College. He understood, however,
that the power of a President does not come from his popularity.
There is a difference between power and authority. Political
power flows from public opinion. It is ephemeral, fickle and fleeting. Authority
comes from the Law. It is based on the formal consent of the governed, granted
in writing and adopted by the people.
George Washington warned us that the Constitution must be
obeyed as it was written, “unless and until it is altered by the explicit and
authentic act of the whole people.”
Article II Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution requires the
President to “take care that the Laws be faithfully executed.”
Ever since Franklin D. Roosevelt appealed directly to the
American People on the radio, there has been an increase of direct Presidential
governance. Executive decisions, executive orders, and bureaucratic rule making
take the place of legislative decision making.
President Trump would be well advised to leave policy making
to the Congress. Maybe the nay sayers will agree to give Congress a chance.
http://www.timesunion.com/local/article/Tonko-focuses-on-U-S-future-10946746.php
ReplyDeleteAbove is a link to a local newspaper story about my Democratic (Not "Democrat") Congressman, Paul Tonko, in our district in upstate New York (20CD), and about his recent Town Hall that was attended by many ofhis anti-Trump constituents. This is a district that largely voted for Trump.
I see no indications in the article that Rep. Tonko or any of his constituents want Trump to "fail." The article comports with my experience. But your recent essay does not.
My experience is that people are AFRAID, based on Trump's Tweets and on rally "rhetoric," that the the presidency is in incompetent and, frankly, dangerous hands.
If you find yourself in a bus being driven in a wild and dangerous manner by an apparently drunk driver (which once happened to me), you don't want him to "fail." But you are desperate to get off the bus or replace the driver, regardless of what the tour company's rule book might say.
This analogy is a bit of a stretch, but it makes my point.
David Frum, the Conservative debater on the "don't give Trump a chance" side of the above debate, participated in a conversation with Sam Harris in a recent recent Harris podcast. Harris and Frum try to be as "charitable" as they can in their assessment of the prospects of a Trump presidency. Frum spells out in detail why Trump supporters ought to think again.
http://tinyurl.com/zy7h6lh
Below is a link to the Intelligence Squared page for the Trump debate. There one can read how the question was framed, read the transcript, and listen to the audio.
http://www.intelligencesquaredus.org/debates/give-trump-chance
When the proposition being debated is whether to "give the President a chance" the expectation that he will fail is irrelevent. It is one thing to expect someone to fail, it is quite another to deny him the opportunity to succeed.
ReplyDelete