We should have known it
would come to this. A male candidate and a female candidate running against
each other for the Presidency of the
United States.
The boys against the girls.
It was ever thus. Any divorce lawyer will tell you that when the flame dies and
animosity sets in, the battle becomes vicious.
Men and women fight
differently, and when they do, their man-ness and woman-ness seeps through.
Charlie Brown gets angry, flustered and red faced. Lucy gets steely eyed and
mean spirited.
Nobody wins domestic
arguments. They just end somehow. Murder, divorce, make up sex. Somehow. Unhappily,
the rhetoric in the 2016 campaign has made it sound like a colossal bedroom
shouting match. And the things they accuse each other of are curious.
Hillary says that Trump is a
misogynist. That means he hates women. To prove it, she points to testimony
that Trump gropes, touches, kisses and ogles women.
Curiously, that would
suggest not only that he doesn’t hate women, but that he is attracted to them
beyond the customary restraints of courtesy and decency.
For his part, Trump attempts
to paint Hillary as a rumor mongering, devious, and dishonest shrew. The
saddest aspect of this phenomenon is the impact it has on the people of the
United States.
We have always been divided
between Republicans and Democrats. Even within families. Somehow we manage to
compartmentalize our politics so that every day life can continue in reasonable
tranquility.
But the emotional dimension
associated with a cross gender feud, has a way of intruding on our lives
differently than the ordinary political debate.
Hillary, of course, plays
the sex card. Constantly and loudly. Why not? She would be the first female
President of the United States. Not only would that be a feather in her cap, it
would be an historic event in which every American, male or female, would take
great pride and satisfaction.
Particularly women.
Particularly our wives, daughters, sisters and mothers.
We like to think that
Presidential elections are decided upon issues relating to the operation of our
government; the kinds of things listed in the Preamble to the Constitution of
the United States: Unity, Justice, Domestic Tranquility, Defense, Welfare and
Liberty; and the character, competence, instincts and experience of the
candidates.
Chauvinism is
defined as excessive or prejudiced loyalty or support for one's own cause,
group, or gender. Surely there are both male and female chauvinists among us.
What they do in the secrecy of the voting booth, and why they do it is their
own business.
But the fact is that the
average voter makes a rather visceral decision on election day. Social
scientists tell us that the outcome of an election can be reliably predicted by
showing pictures of the candidates to people who do not know who they are, what
they are running for or what they believe or stand for.
If that is so, how much
gender biased inertia will affect the outcome on November 8, and how much the
election result will disturb American family tranquility no one knows or can
predict. My guess is that an attractive woman would beat a homely man and vice
versa.
I well remember the heated
argument my parents had when my Dad learned that my Mother had voted in favor
of allowing oleomargarine to be artificially colored to look like butter.
We can only
deplore the fact that ‘Peanuts’ cartoonist Charles M. Schulz is no longer with us and able to cast Donald Trump as
Charlie Brown and Hillary Clinton as Lucy.
America needs a good laugh.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.