Now the talk is whether Francis, the charismatic Pontiff, is
going to change the Catholic Church. “Modernize” it, as they say.
Some conservative folks had hoped that he would condemn gay
marriage. He didn’t. On the other hand, he didn’t endorse it either. What he
did was to preside over a carefully scripted celebration of traditional
marriage. Sort of reminded me of the old song: “You gotta ak – sen –chu –ate
the positive, ee – lim -- anate the negative. Don’t mess with mister in
between.”
The secular media has spent much time talking about the
Pope’s famous comment, “Who am I to judge?”
They see it as an endorsement of the secular moral commandment: Thou
Shalt Not Be Judgmental.
Many of us were tempted to answer the Pope’s rhetorical
question with something like this: Who are you? You’re the Pope, for goodness
sake. You occupy the Chair of Peter, to whom Jesus said “Upon this rock I shall
build my church. Whose sins you shall forgive, they are forgiven, whose sins
you shall retain they are retained.” It’s your job to teach folks about right
and wrong, to pronounce infallibly, ex cathedra, ‘from the chair’ on matters of
faith and morals. What do you mean, “Who am I?”
The truth is that the Chair of Peter is not a comfortable
seat for a humble man. Francis teaches us that loving the sinner is more
important than hating the sin. Indeed, he challenges us to forget about hating
anything – sin included. Especially since we are all sinners. Especially
because the divine gift of free will means that all human beings have the
capacity to do what they know they should not do.
The Church reserves condemnation to the human conscience.
That’s what the Sacrament of Penance is all about. “Bless me Father, for I have
sinned.” “I have sinned.” Not, the neighbors say I have sinned or the
media says that I have sinned, or the Church, or the Pope says that I have
sinned, but I am telling you that I have sinned. I am my only accuser.
It’s called conscience, and it is the moral compass that
holds all of human society together. At the University of Detroit, nearly three quarters of a
century ago, Jack Roland taught us that Ethics is the science of the “oughtness
of things.” He told us that human beings have an instinctive inclination to
think about what they should or should not do, and that free will involves the
constant tug of war between ‘I wanna’ and ‘I awta.’
Dwight Eisenhower put it this way; as individuals and as a
nation, we should seek always to act in our enlightened self interest. Perhaps
enlightenment is the one moral imperative on which all people of good will can
agree.
We live in an age of communication. We are surrounded by the
incessant drumbeat of advertising, solicitation, news, information, and
personal communication. We are emailed, facebooked, tweeted, texted, and
harangued non stop from television, telephone, radio and computer. Just how
much of it is fairly called enlightenment is hard to say.
But it does seem to me that enlightenment about the
oughtness of things should be given a rather high priority in human
communication. In the last analysis the experience of mankind is the best
teacher, and we ignore it at our peril.
History, indeed, is an imperative teacher. He who does not
learn the lessons of history is condemned to repeat the mistakes of the past.
It makes no sense to mandate the latest dicta of behavioral science in our
classrooms while forbidding the teacher to post the ten commandments on the
bulletin board.
We Americans are the fortunate heirs of the civilization
known as Christendom. It has enabled us to become a people governed by
representatives of our own choosing, committed to the rule of law, and united
in the pursuit of justice and liberty.
The Roman Catholic Church is an important part of that
heritage. The Pope is its leader. He is not a judge. He is a teacher.
Pope Francis is an Argentine. He doesn’t speak our language,
at least not very well, so far. But he is the Pope. The Vicar of Christ on earth.
He is a blessing and wellspring of enlightenment for all men and women of good
will. He will help us all to figure out for ourselves what is right and what is
wrong.
And in the end, our personal judgment is what really
matters.
Tom, fabulous assessment of some confusing issues raised by the Pope during his visit. I am seriously disappointed he did not decry the horrible persecution of Christians in the Middle East.
ReplyDeletewrong! yes he sure did. he even carried a crucifix that belonged to a Christian priest, murdered in the middle east for his religious beliefs.
Deletewrong! yes he did.
Delete